Re: history writes to process substitution but errors reading it

2025-02-19 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025, at 9:48 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote: > What it is really doing is "declare foo to > be the history file, and then read its contents and put them in the > history list". The problem as I see it is that the easiest to spot part > of the documentation is > > -r Re

Re: history writes to process substitution but errors reading it

2025-02-19 Thread Dale R. Worley
Andreas Schwab writes: > On Feb 14 2025, Dale R. Worley wrote: > >> And really, that means that the effect of -r is kind of complicated and >> unintuitive. > > Not really. The command uses either the supplied filename or $HISTFILE > to name the file to operate on. Other than that, the filename a