Re: pwd and prompt don't update after deleting current working directory

2024-07-12 Thread Chet Ramey
On 7/11/24 9:53 PM, David Hedlund wrote: Thanks, Lawrence! I found this discussion helpful and believe it would be a valuable feature to add. Can I submit this as a feature request? I'm not going to add this. It's not generally useful for interactive shells, and dangerous for non-interactive s

Re: waiting for process substitutions

2024-07-12 Thread Chet Ramey
On 7/9/24 6:12 AM, Zachary Santer wrote: On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 2:38 PM Chet Ramey wrote: On 6/29/24 10:51 PM, Zachary Santer wrote: so you were then able to wait for each process substitution individually, as long as you saved $! after they were created. `wait' without arguments would still

Re: waiting for process substitutions

2024-07-12 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Fri, 12 Jul 2024 11:48:15 -0400 From:Chet Ramey Message-ID: <258bcd3a-a936-4751-8e24-916fbeb9c...@case.edu> | Not really, since the original intent was to wait for the *next* process | to terminate. There are two issues with that. The first is "next after

Re: waiting for process substitutions

2024-07-12 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 07:40:42 +0700, Robert Elz wrote: > Please just change this, use the first definition of "next job to > finish" - and in the case when there are already several of them, > pick one, any one - you could order them by the time that bash reaped > the jobs internally, but there'

[bug #65981] "bash test -v" does not work as documented with "export KEY="

2024-07-12 Thread anonymous
URL: Summary: "bash test -v" does not work as documented with "export KEY=" Group: The GNU Bourne-Again SHell Submitter: None Submitted: Sat 13 Jul 2024 02:15:01 AM UTC Catego

Re: waiting for process substitutions

2024-07-12 Thread Oğuz
On Saturday, July 13, 2024, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > If two jobs happen to finish simultaneously, the next call to wait -n > should reap one of them, and then the call after that should reap > the other. That's how everyone wants it to work, as far as I've seen. > > *Nobody* wants it to skip the

Re: [bug #65981] "bash test -v" does not work as documented with "export KEY="

2024-07-12 Thread Andreas Kähäri
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 10:15:02PM -0400, anonymous wrote: > URL: > > > Summary: "bash test -v" does not work as documented with > "export KEY=" >Group: The GNU Bourne-Again SHell >Submitter: None >