2022年11月1日(火) 0:59 Chet Ramey :
> If someone wanted to do this, I would take a look at incorporating the
> results, as long as it didn't add dependencies on, say, pcre or gnulib
> regex.
Instead of translating the pattern to a regular expression and
compiling it by regcomp (), I have experimentall
Hi,
I noticed that Bash code sometimes uses macros where a static inline function
would appear to work equally as well.
For instance, consider the macro ALL_ELEMENT_SUB defined in array.h:
#define ALL_ELEMENT_SUB(c) ((c) == '@' || (c) == '*')
I imagine this could be turned into a function l
Hi,
In bash-5.2.9 if HAVE_SELECT is set but HAVE_PSELECT is not, we still need
the "fd_set readfds;" at line 808 in lib/readline/input.c. Found on Tru64
5.1.
Also this platform doesn't have strtoimax but config.h is still setting
#define HAVE_DECL_STRTOIMAX 1
#define HAVE_DECL_STRTOLL 1
#define
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: x86_64
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g
-grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
-specs=
2022年11月15日(火) 0:22 Chet Ramey :
> On 8/11/22 5:56 PM, Koichi Murase wrote:
> > Can we also change the behavior of TERM in a similar way with option
> > 4? Currently, a temporal change of TERM clears keybindings of some
> > keys (home, end, right, left, etc.) even when the temporal change does
> >
On 11/12/22 4:39 AM, Kerin Millar wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 09:50:51 -0500
Chet Ramey wrote:
BASH PATCH REPORT
=
Bash-Release: 5.2
Patch-ID: bash52-009
Are there any plans to backport the "fixes for extended g
On 8/11/22 5:56 PM, Koichi Murase wrote:
Can we also change the behavior of TERM in a similar way with option
4? Currently, a temporal change of TERM clears keybindings of some
keys (home, end, right, left, etc.) even when the temporal change does
not survive across multiple calls of readline:
On 11/14/22 11:40 AM, Koichi Murase wrote:
2022年11月15日(火) 0:22 Chet Ramey :
On 8/11/22 5:56 PM, Koichi Murase wrote:
Can we also change the behavior of TERM in a similar way with option
4? Currently, a temporal change of TERM clears keybindings of some
keys (home, end, right, left, etc.) even
w2022年11月15日(火) 5:31 Chet Ramey :
> On 11/14/22 11:40 AM, Koichi Murase wrote:
> > 2022年11月15日(火) 0:22 Chet Ramey :
> >> On 8/11/22 5:56 PM, Koichi Murase wrote:
> >>> Can we also change the behavior of TERM in a similar way with option
> >>> 4? Currently, a temporal change of TERM clears keybind
2022年11月15日(火) 8:46 Brent Pappas :
> I noticed that Bash code sometimes uses macros where a static inline function
> would appear to work equally as well.
> For instance, consider the macro ALL_ELEMENT_SUB defined in array.h:
The inline keyword is introduced in C99, but Bash is written in C89,
an
2022年11月11日(金) 8:48 Koichi Murase :
> 2022年11月11日(金) 7:58 of1 :
> > [...]
> > read -set .001 -d '' DISCARD
> > before the actual read -e
> > Alas, this does not work anymore with 5.2 (-e and -t
> > combination triggers shell exit or, when used in a script, prevents
> > fu
On 10/3/22 2:56 PM, Evan Gates wrote:
---
There is currently no good way to sort files by mtime in the shell.
It's possible to do so with an ls that supports -t, but parsing ls is
problematic.
Thanks for the patch. There are some good things here, usable stuff, but I
think I'll look at a more
2022年10月10日(月) 22:47 Chet Ramey :
> > 2022年10月4日(火) 0:56 Chet Ramey :
> >>> I expect the same behavior of `f1' and `f2' as far as there are no
> >>> background jobs.
> >>
> >> Why? f2 calls `jobs', and so requests information in a particular format,
> >> which may or may not be the same format as t
2022年11月15日(火) 9:04 Henry Bent :
> In bash-5.2.9 if HAVE_SELECT is set but HAVE_PSELECT is not, we still need
> the "fd_set readfds;" at line 808 in lib/readline/input.c. Found on Tru64
> 5.1.
This seems to be reported repeatedly for different lines in the source code.
https://lists.gnu.org/arch
2022年11月15日(火) 1:47 Koichi Murase :
> I'm just planning to quickly check the behavior of "the next devel
> push", which seems to be not yet pushed to savannah. Thank you.
I checked the latest devel push, where I confirmed that it now works. Thank you.
> On 14 Nov 2022, at 20:03, Chet Ramey wrote:
>
> On 11/12/22 4:39 AM, Kerin Millar wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 09:50:51 -0500
>> Chet Ramey wrote:
>>> BASH PATCH REPORT
>>> =
>>>
>>> Bash-Release: 5.2
>>> Patch-ID: bash52-009
>> Are there any plans to backport the "f
16 matches
Mail list logo