On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 4:35 PM Chet Ramey wrote:
> Let's try it. Thanks for the report.
It seems to be already fixed in 5.2-alpha (thanks), but I can't see it
mentioned in the changelog. Can you kindly confirm if it really is?
--
konsolebox
On 2/6/22 4:23 AM, konsolebox wrote:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 4:35 PM Chet Ramey wrote:
Let's try it. Thanks for the report.
It seems to be already fixed in 5.2-alpha (thanks), but I can't see it
mentioned in the changelog. Can you kindly confirm if it really is?
From CHANGES:
"bb. Array r
> On 2022/01/02 17:43, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
>
> > Why would you? Aren't you able to assess the severity of a bug
> > yourself? Silent data corruption is certainly one of the most severe
> > kind of bugs ...
> ---
> That's debatable, BTW, as I was reminded of a similar
> passthrough of what one m
On 2/5/22 9:41 PM, L A Walsh wrote:
That's debatable, BTW, as I was reminded of a similar
passthrough of what one might call 'invalid input' w/o warning,
resulting in code that worked in a specific circumstance to a change
in bash issuing a warning that resulted in breaking code, that, at that
p
i just have a small question here
the dropping of null bytes is no friend of me and i understand you're
there to skip it instead of process, which results in null bytes gone
which is not much of an use
can't these \0 bytes be encoded at least when a utf8 locale is used as
\u0 instead of dropping ?
im sorry i didnt realize it would just prefix to null byte, which uses
nullbyte, so it wont work
cheers
On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 11:11 PM Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
>
> i just have a small question here
> the dropping of null bytes is no friend of me and i understand you're
> there to skip it inst
a replacement sequence to null bytes i would find a solution to null bytes
no i didnt understand these posts of these emails but i am just
concerned about the null bytes not being dropped
On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 11:16 PM Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
>
> im sorry i didnt realize it would just prefix
On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 11:11:43PM +0100, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
> [[ Regarding nul bytes discarded by command substitution ]]
> can't these \0 bytes be encoded at least when a utf8 locale is used as
> \u0 instead of dropping ? and a null, ... just
> prefix the utf 8 encoding chars to the nul
Date:Sun, 6 Feb 2022 18:01:03 -0500
From:Greg Wooledge
Message-ID:
| I urge you to learn one of these other languages, and use it.
|
| Bash is a shell, not a full general-purpose programming language. It's
| not suited to all tasks. Many other languages are
On 2022/02/06 09:26, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
On 2022/01/02 17:43, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
Why would you? Aren't you able to assess the severity of a bug
yourself? Silent data corruption is certainly one of the most severe
kind of bugs ...
---
That's debatable, BTW, as I was rem
On 2/6/22 5:11 PM, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
i just have a small question here
the dropping of null bytes is no friend of me and i understand you're
there to skip it instead of process, which results in null bytes gone
which is not much of an use
can't these \0 bytes be encoded at least when a
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 12:02 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 11:11:43PM +0100, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
> > [[ Regarding nul bytes discarded by command substitution ]]
> > can't these \0 bytes be encoded at least when a utf8 locale is used as
> > \u0 instead of dropping ? a
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 1:47 AM L A Walsh wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 2022/02/06 09:26, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
> >> On 2022/01/02 17:43, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Why would you? Aren't you able to assess the severity of a bug
> >>> yourself? Silent data corruption is certainly one of the mos
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 3:37 AM Chet Ramey wrote:
>
> On 2/6/22 5:11 PM, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
> > i just have a small question here
> > the dropping of null bytes is no friend of me and i understand you're
> > there to skip it instead of process, which results in null bytes gone
> > which is
On Sun, Feb 6, 2022, at 11:53 PM, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 12:02 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> There are other programming languages besides bash. Some of them can
>> store NUL bytes internally, either by encoding and decoding them on the
>> fly, or by not using C-style s
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 6:19 AM Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2022, at 11:53 PM, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 12:02 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >> There are other programming languages besides bash. Some of them can
> >> store NUL bytes internally, either by
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022, at 1:26 AM, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
> well i saw now, printf a char of "\0" results in 0 bytes out to wc -c
% /usr/bin/printf '\0' | wc -c
1
> however my solution still stays
> you just use memory locations instead of c strings
> and those entries in memory are of
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022, 00:31 Chet Ramey, wrote:
> From CHANGES:
>
> ...
Well I'm glad. Thanks again!
--
konsolebox
18 matches
Mail list logo
