On Thursday, 27 November 2014 17:57:30 UTC, konsolebox wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 12:36 AM, steveT steveT wrote:
> > Is there any way that I can trace them back to their 'creator'?
>
> Besides checking common startup files like /etc/profile and ~/.profile or
> ~/.bashrc (see
> http://www.g
On Friday, 28 November 2014 08:00:18 UTC, steveT wrote:
> On Thursday, 27 November 2014 17:57:30 UTC, konsolebox wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 12:36 AM, steveT steveT wrote:
> > > Is there any way that I can trace them back to their 'creator'?
> >
> > Besides checking common startup files l
2014-11-28 9:43 GMT+01:00 steveT :
> OK - found the functions that are appearing. I was grepping BASH_FUNC__ in
> etc - wrong. The functions are in the /usr/share/bash-completion/completions
> directory - and exist as rcs and sudo files. The code in those files
> defines functions for _rcs and _s
Hi out there. Will it be good to add json support in bash internally. As
in variable declarations: decalre "-j" "{"variable":"value"}"
smime.p7s
Description: Криптографическая подпись S/MIME
Doesn't seem like a bug to me. You asked your terminal emulator to clear
the screen. It did so. Now you complain that it's "too clean" :)
I understand how it may look confusing, but I don't think the term has
much option here. Suppose that instead of the shell, you were executing
something else (e
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:25:52AM +0600, Sergei Tokaev wrote:
> Hi out there. Will it be good to add json support in bash internally. As
> in variable declarations: decalre "-j" "{"variable":"value"}"
This doesn't seem like an appropriate addition to bash, in my opinion.
Where do you draw the lin
On Friday, 28 November 2014 09:02:56 UTC, Geir Hauge wrote:
> 2014-11-28 9:43 GMT+01:00 steveT :
>
>
> OK - found the functions that are appearing. I was grepping BASH_FUNC__ in
> etc - wrong. The functions are in the /usr/share/bash-completion/completions
> directory - and exist as rcs and su
On 28/11/14 13:02, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:25:52AM +0600, Sergei Tokaev wrote:
>> Hi out there. Will it be good to add json support in bash internally. As
>> in variable declarations: decalre "-j" "{"variable":"value"}"
>
> This doesn't seem like an appropriate addition t
>Doesn't seem like a bug to me. You asked your terminal emulator to clear
>the screen. It did so. Now you complain that it's "too clean" :)
When I type Ctrl-L, screen clears, and prompt appears. Ctrl-Shift-X should work
the same and it should clear scrollback additionally.
bash 4.3 + konsole behav
On 11/27/14 11:25 PM, Sergei Tokaev wrote:
> Hi out there. Will it be good to add json support in bash internally. As
> in variable declarations: decalre "-j" "{"variable":"value"}"
Why? What advantage would be gained by doing this? Is there a large
number of developers wanting this feature? (H
So, referring to man bash, this is the description of +=:
When += is applied to an array variable using compound assignment (see
Arrays below), the variable's value is not unset (as it is when using =),
and new values are appended to the array beginning at one greater than
the array's maximum
On 11/27/14 5:27 PM, Askar Safin wrote:
> Steps to reproduce: open konsole (with bash in it) and type Ctrl-Shift-X
> (this is shortcut for "Clear Scrollback and Reset" feature in konsole). What
> I see: the terminal clears and no prompt appear. What I expected: I expected
> prompt to appear.
>
On 11/28/14 10:34 AM, Askar Safin wrote:
>> Doesn't seem like a bug to me. You asked your terminal emulator to clear
>> the screen. It did so. Now you complain that it's "too clean" :)
> When I type Ctrl-L, screen clears, and prompt appears. Ctrl-Shift-X should
> work the same and it should clear
>There are only a couple of ways to do this, so even though the mechanism
>konsole uses is undocumented, we can try to figure it out. There are two
>possibilities: inject a character into the input stream, or send a signal
>to the foreground process group.
I tested this. This is not some symbol in
Manual of BASH claims:
"Assignments to FUNCNAME have no effect and return an error status."
However assignments to FUNCNAME actually break FUNCNAME.
I use BASH 4.3.30.
Variant with "local":
$ A() { echo A; declare -p FUNCNAME; local FUNCNAME=(); }
$ B() { echo B; declare -p FUNCNAME; }
$ A
A
de
>> Also, is there somewhere some real revision control system with bash
>> sources? http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/bash.git appears to be
>> incomplete: "git bisect" shows that the problem is in
>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/bash.git/commit/?id=ac50fbac377e32b98d2de396f016ea81e8ee9961
On 11/28/14 8:17 PM, Askar Safin wrote:
>>> Also, is there somewhere some real revision control system with bash
>>> sources? http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/bash.git appears to be
>>> incomplete: "git bisect" shows that the problem is in
>>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/bash.git/commit/?
On 11/28/14 5:38 PM, Askar Safin wrote:
>> There are only a couple of ways to do this, so even though the mechanism
>> konsole uses is undocumented, we can try to figure it out. There are two
>> possibilities: inject a character into the input stream, or send a signal
>> to the foreground process
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/28/14 7:53 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> Manual of BASH claims:
> "Assignments to FUNCNAME have no effect and return an error status."
>
> However assignments to FUNCNAME actually break FUNCNAME.
> I use BASH 4.3.30.
Thanks f
19 matches
Mail list logo
