Antonio Macchi schrieb:
> what's the rasonable limit in using this "compact" contruct, after which
> the for (( i=0; i<1000...; i++ )) became better?
Hardware/OS limits.
J.
Antonio Macchi wrote:
> what's the rasonable limit in using this "compact" contruct, after which
> the for (( i=0; i<1000...; i++ )) became better?
You didn't even bother trying eh?
$ for i in {0..10}; do echo $i>/dev/null; done
bash: xmalloc: ../../../bash/lib/sh/stringvec.c:40: cann
what's the rasonable limit in using this "compact" contruct, after which
the for (( i=0; i<1000...; i++ )) became better?