Dan Nicolaescu wrote:
> Chet Ramey writes:
> > Dan Nicolaescu wrote:
> > > Unfortunately the behavior is not consistent with what dabbrev-expand
> > > does in Emacs (and tcsh), so it will be quite confusing for users to
> > > use.
> > ...
> > It might not be exactly the way emacs and tc
Chet Ramey writes:
> Dan Nicolaescu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for implementing dabbrev-expand in bash-4.0!
> >
> > Unfortunately the behavior is not consistent with what dabbrev-expand
> > does in Emacs (and tcsh), so it will be quite confusing for users to
> > use.
>
>
Dan Nicolaescu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for implementing dabbrev-expand in bash-4.0!
>
> Unfortunately the behavior is not consistent with what dabbrev-expand
> does in Emacs (and tcsh), so it will be quite confusing for users to
> use.
Since the dabbrev-expand implementation combines existing me
Hi,
Thanks for implementing dabbrev-expand in bash-4.0!
Unfortunately the behavior is not consistent with what dabbrev-expand
does in Emacs (and tcsh), so it will be quite confusing for users to
use.
Doing
# bind dabbrev-expand to it's canonical key:
$ bind '"\M-/":dabbrev-expand'
# Now run a f
