On 6/2/15 5:24 AM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> I'm surprised to read you saying that this is not a problem with Bash.
Because technically the history facilities are provided by readline, and
bash builds on those.
> I use Bash as my shell. As configure it (from its appropriate config
> file). And I get r
I'm surprised to read you saying that this is not a problem with Bash.
I use Bash as my shell. As configure it (from its appropriate config
file). And I get results opposite to what would be expected. And you say
there is no problem with bash? Bash does not only deal with in memory
lists because i
On 5/15/15 8:44 AM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> I have this issue, and talking with several people and searching around,
> I see that this seems to be a recurring problem for many users.
>
> Some just "fix" it around by using a N times bigger history than they
> wished. Others just consider it a "bug tha
I have this issue, and talking with several people and searching around,
I see that this seems to be a recurring problem for many users.
Some just "fix" it around by using a N times bigger history than they
wished. Others just consider it a "bug that exists, but won't do nothing
about it".
It fee
