On Feb 27, 2009, at 4:02 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
Ben wrote:
I ran into a problem using process substitution
This will be fixed in the next version.
thank you!
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
i've noticed
Ben Hyde wrote:
> I ran into a problem using process substitution. A much reduced version is
> show below. The function f2 has the problem, the function f1 does not.
> Are
> there is some facts about the life cycle of the files created by
> process substitution I don't appreciate? - ben
This w
Greg Wooledge eeg.ccf.org> writes:
> For whatever it's worth, I can reproduce this behavior on both Linux
> and OpenBSD (which use /dev/fd/*), in several versions of bash, but
> not on HP-UX (which uses named pipes).
I can reproduce it also with bash 4 and bash 3.2 under gentoo
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 09:26:29AM -0500, Ben Hyde wrote:
> f2(){
> date
> cat $1
> }
> f2 <(echo l8r)
> Fri Feb 27 09:18:45 EST 2009
> cat: /dev/fd/63: Bad file descriptor
For whatever it's worth, I can reproduce this behavior on both Linux
and OpenBSD (which use /dev/fd/*), in several vers
