On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 09:29 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 9/24/19 3:04 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
> > Hi Kerin,
> >
> > That indeed solves the problem in 'accesstime.sh', although I would
> > recommend some sort of reference from the bash manpage to the mount
> > manpage.
> >
> > Did you have a look
On 9/24/19 3:04 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
> Hi Kerin,
>
> That indeed solves the problem in 'accesstime.sh', although I would
> recommend some sort of reference from the bash manpage to the mount
> manpage.
>
> Did you have a look at the 'conditional.sh' script too? Looks like the
> '-N' switch com
Strange, it seems the replies did come through. So have you seen them?
Let's try the gnome mail client, at least I got a receipt this time.
Regards,
Mischa.
On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 09:04 +0200, Mischa Baars wrote:
> Hi Kerin,
>
> That indeed solves the problem in 'accesstime.sh', although I would
Hi Kerin,
That indeed solves the problem in 'accesstime.sh', although I would
recommend some sort of reference from the bash manpage to the mount
manpage.
Did you have a look at the 'conditional.sh' script too? Looks like the
'-N' switch compares only the integer part of the timestamp seconds.
R
Hi Kerin and Chet,
Testing mailing list. My earlier replies didn't come through.
Regards,
Mischa.
On Tue, 2019-07-09 at 11:16 +0100, k...@plushkava.net wrote:
> Hi Mischa,
>
> On Tue, 09 Jul 2019 09:05:45 +0200
> Mischa Baars wrote:
>
> > Hi Kerin,
> >
> > That indeed solves the problem in '
On 7/9/19 12:12 PM, k...@plushkava.net wrote:
>> The code just returns (atime <= mtime), and has since 1997. It uses the
>> st_atime and st_mtime fields. I should update it to use timespecs if
>> they're available, and (mtime > atime) might work closer to your
>> expectations.
>>
>> After the call
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 10:48:32 -0400
Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 7/9/19 6:16 AM, k...@plushkava.net wrote:
>
> >> Did you have a look at the 'conditional.sh' script too? Looks like the
> >> '-N' switch compares only the integer part of the timestamp seconds.
> >
> > The stat structure supports timesta
On 7/9/19 6:16 AM, k...@plushkava.net wrote:
>> Did you have a look at the 'conditional.sh' script too? Looks like the '-N'
>> switch compares only the integer part of the timestamp seconds.
>
> The stat structure supports timestamp fields of nanosecond granularity since
> POSIX.1-2008, so it s
Hi Mischa,
On Tue, 09 Jul 2019 09:05:45 +0200
Mischa Baars wrote:
> Hi Kerin,
>
> That indeed solves the problem in 'accesstime.sh', although I would recommend
> some sort of reference from the bash manpage to the mount manpage.
>
> Did you have a look at the 'conditional.sh' script too? Look
On Mon, 08 Jul 2019 09:29:19 +0200
"mjbaars1977.bug-bash" wrote:
> Hi,I'm having some difficulties with the file access time and the file
> modification time. Scripts are attached for your convenience.Regards,Mischa
> Baars.Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
If you are using Linux, you sh
10 matches
Mail list logo