2011-11-23, 12:00(-05), Chet Ramey:
> On 11/22/11 4:53 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> This is a feature request, rather than a bug. Bash 4.2's printf command
>> has a lovely %(datefmt)T feature that allows it to print out formatted
>> timestamps using the underlying operating system's strftime(3) rou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/23/11 12:29 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/23/2011 10:11 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:00:34PM -0500, Chet Ramey wrote:
>>> I wonder if a better way to handle this is to require the %s expansion
>>> at configure time and u
On 11/23/2011 10:11 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:00:34PM -0500, Chet Ramey wrote:
>> I wonder if a better way to handle this is to require the %s expansion
>> at configure time and use the strftime replacement in lib/sh if the C
>> library's strftime doesn't implement it.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:00:34PM -0500, Chet Ramey wrote:
> I wonder if a better way to handle this is to require the %s expansion
> at configure time and use the strftime replacement in lib/sh if the C
> library's strftime doesn't implement it. What systems, if you know, do
> not handle %s?
HP
On 11/22/11 4:53 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> This is a feature request, rather than a bug. Bash 4.2's printf command
> has a lovely %(datefmt)T feature that allows it to print out formatted
> timestamps using the underlying operating system's strftime(3) routine.
> It even allows bash to print the
