Re: bash doesn't display tabs for tabs -- ignores tabstops.

2013-05-15 Thread Linda Walsh
Eduardo Bustamante wrote: > The cool thing about free software is that you're free to submit > patches. Please consider that option, instead of ranting on what Chet > should do. > --- Ranting? Chet seemed to indicate he wouldn't accept a patch. If, OTOH, he left that open... then, you are rig

Re: bash doesn't display tabs for tabs -- ignores tabstops.

2013-05-15 Thread Eduardo Bustamante
The cool thing about free software is that you're free to submit patches. Please consider that option, instead of ranting on what Chet should do. -- Eduardo A. Bustamante López

Re: bash doesn't display tabs for tabs -- ignores tabstops.

2013-05-15 Thread Linda Walsh
Chet Ramey wrote: > On 4/25/13 8:45 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote: > >> If you think Bash is misbehaving, submit a patch, or wait for Chet to >> comment on one of these threads. > > I don't plan to comment or make any changes. The demand for this feature > seems vanishingly small. --- It's c

Re: bash doesn't display tabs for tabs -- ignores tabstops.

2013-04-30 Thread Linda Walsh
Chet Ramey wrote: > On 4/25/13 8:45 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote: > >> If you think Bash is misbehaving, submit a patch, or wait for Chet to >> comment on one of these threads. > > I don't plan to comment or make any changes. The demand for this feature > seems vanishingly small. Delib

Re: bash doesn't display tabs for tabs -- ignores tabstops.

2013-04-30 Thread Chet Ramey
On 4/25/13 8:45 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote: > If you think Bash is misbehaving, submit a patch, or wait for Chet to > comment on one of these threads. I don't plan to comment or make any changes. The demand for this feature seems vanishingly small. Chet -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long t

Re: bash doesn't display tabs for tabs -- ignores tabstops.

2013-04-26 Thread Linda Walsh
Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 08:02:29PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: >> My terminal is displayed via 'X' --- X pics up >> the actual characters that were echoed to the screen. If TABS are >> used, it put's TABS in the copy/paste-buffer. > > That is not how my terminal works.

Re: bash doesn't display tabs for tabs -- ignores tabstops.

2013-04-25 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 08:02:29PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: > My terminal is displayed via 'X' --- X pics up > the actual characters that were echoed to the screen. If TABS are > used, it put's TABS in the copy/paste-buffer. That is not how my terminal works. imadev:~$ echo $'tab>\t

Re: bash doesn't display tabs for tabs -- ignores tabstops.

2013-04-24 Thread Linda Walsh
Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:42:34PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: >> Was my elaboration clear enough -- ? >> >> It's a display issue not a content issue -- except when you cut/paste >> from the terminal to another buffer under X. > > You forgot to copy the mailing list. Also, X

Re: bash doesn't display tabs for tabs -- ignores tabstops.

2013-04-22 Thread Linda Walsh
Greg Wooledge wrote: > > Which means I typed <'> > <'> at the Bash prompt. > > Then I pressed(I use vi editing mode also). > > Inside vi(m), I verified that the stuff in front of the y is an actual > Tab character. --- The problem is not that it replaces with space in the user-

Re: bash doesn't display tabs for tabs -- ignores tabstops.

2013-04-22 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:35:02PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: > I.e. do whatever you do to insert a TAB there. for me, I press TAB, > Others have to work around BASH's unwanted, 4.x behavior. I am not able to reproduce your problem. Here is what I did: imadev:~$ echo 'x y z' Which means

Re: bash doesn't display tabs for tabs -- ignores tabstops.

2013-04-22 Thread Linda Walsh
Greg Wooledge wrote: > Are you perhaps pressing Ctrl-V Tab? Or have you done funny things with > readline bindings? Or are you editing .bash_history with a text editor > and then re-invoking bash in order to artificially insert a command > with literal tabs into the shell's history buffer? ---

Re: bash doesn't display tabs for tabs -- ignores tabstops.

2013-04-22 Thread Linda Walsh
p.s. -- sorry for double post... but the fact that bad-design trumps user usage steams me. > Greg Wooledge wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:54:35AM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: >>> Type in this: >>> echo 'while read fn;do >>> d=${fn%.zip} >> This is where I lose you completely. If I press Tab

Re: bash doesn't display tabs for tabs -- ignores tabstops.

2013-04-22 Thread Linda Walsh
Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:54:35AM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: >> Type in this: >> echo 'while read fn;do >> d=${fn%.zip} > > This is where I lose you completely. If I press Tab where you indicate, > nothing happens at all. --- But that is an empty line -- TAB 'should' be i

Re: bash doesn't display tabs for tabs -- ignores tabstops.

2013-04-22 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:54:35AM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: > Type in this: > echo 'while read fn;do > d=${fn%.zip} This is where I lose you completely. If I press Tab where you indicate, nothing happens at all. If I press Tab twice in a row there, bash offers to tab-complete against all the fi

Re: bash doesn't display tabs for tabs -- ignores tabstops.

2013-04-22 Thread Linda Walsh
Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:25:20AM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: >> If I 'reedit my last "statement", it indents 8 spaces/tab. > > What does this sentence mean? I am completely stumped. What is > the sequence of steps you are actually performing? --- Type in this: echo 'whil

Re: bash doesn't display tabs for tabs -- ignores tabstops.

2013-04-22 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:25:20AM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: > If I 'reedit my last "statement", it indents 8 spaces/tab. What does this sentence mean? I am completely stumped. What is the sequence of steps you are actually performing?