Re: Questions about commandline-args

2011-11-12 Thread Christopher Roy Bratusek
On Saturday 12 November 2011 02:02:01 Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: > On Sat, 12 Nov 2011, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote: > > On Friday 11 November 2011 19:32:51 Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: > >> On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote: > >>> Hi list, > >>> > >>> I've got a question about co

Re: Questions about commandline-args

2011-11-11 Thread Chris F.A. Johnson
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote: On Friday 11 November 2011 19:32:51 Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote: Hi list, I've got a question about commandline args, imagine: personal_function ab{c,d} personal_function will receive abc

Re: Questions about commandline-args

2011-11-11 Thread Christopher Roy Bratusek
On Friday 11 November 2011 19:32:51 Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: > On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > I've got a question about commandline args, imagine: > > > > personal_function ab{c,d} > > > > personal_function will receive abc and abd. > > Is there a way

Re: Questions about commandline-args

2011-11-11 Thread Chris F.A. Johnson
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote: Hi list, I've got a question about commandline args, imagine: personal_function ab{c,d} personal_function will receive abc and abd. Is there a way to make it receive ab{c,d} instead (without chaning the arguement itself)? Quote it: per