On 4/5/11 3:22 PM, gmail wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have to apologize because i have not fully read you, there probably a
> more efficient way to deal with static librariries in the iconv distribution.
> Therefore, the suggested patch was of no use.
It has the advantage of working. I haven't ident
Hello,
I have to apologize because i have not fully read you, there probably a
more efficient way to deal with static librariries in the iconv
distribution.
Therefore, the suggested patch was of no use.
Another point, i see that the tests/intl2.sub make a direct call to a
"/usr/bin/printf"
Hello,
I have take a deep breath and dive in the autotools documentation.
Here is the resulting patch that i think (hope ?) should be ok with any
hosts/shells/archs :
--- bash-4.2_static/aclocal.m4.orig 2011-04-03 14:02:35.0 +0200
+++ bash-4.2_static/aclocal.m4 2011-04-05 00:2
On 4/3/11 9:01 AM, gmail wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is my first contact and mail with bash mailing list, to summarize i'm
> a coder maintening a personnal home server using several GNU tools since
> the late 90's.
>
>
> I configure BASH-4.2.0 in a chroot jail (gcc 4.5.2/libc 2.13/binutils
> 2.21/m
