Re: 'hash foo' may fail, and would require something like 'hash /usr/bin/foo'

On Mär 11 2022, Ángel wrote: > On 2022-03-09 at 20:35 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> On Mär 09 2022, Chet Ramey wrote: >> >> > Ultimately, this comes down to gaps in the release engineering. >> >> That won't help, the container image often comes from a different source >> than the docker packag

Re: 'hash foo' may fail, and would require something like 'hash /usr/bin/foo'

On 2022-03-09 at 20:35 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Mär 09 2022, Chet Ramey wrote: > > > Ultimately, this comes down to gaps in the release engineering. > > That won't help, the container image often comes from a different source > than the docker package. The system (under all those condit

Re: 'hash foo' may fail, and would require something like 'hash /usr/bin/foo'

On Mär 09 2022, Chet Ramey wrote: > Ultimately, this comes down to gaps in the release engineering. That won't help, the container image often comes from a different source than the docker package. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF7

Re: 'hash foo' may fail, and would require something like 'hash /usr/bin/foo'

On 3/9/22 12:25 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Mär 09 2022, Chet Ramey wrote: > >> Basically, musl libc enabled the faccessat2(2) system call and started >> using it in faccessat(2). access(2) ends up calling faccessat, which now >> uses faccessat2 if it's available. Alpine Linux 3.14 incorrectly

Re: 'hash foo' may fail, and would require something like 'hash /usr/bin/foo'

On Mär 09 2022, Chet Ramey wrote: > Basically, musl libc enabled the faccessat2(2) system call and started > using it in faccessat(2). access(2) ends up calling faccessat, which now > uses faccessat2 if it's available. Alpine Linux 3.14 incorrectly returned > EPERM for unknown system calls instead

Re: 'hash foo' may fail, and would require something like 'hash /usr/bin/foo'

On 2/22/22 10:10 AM, Benoit Lacelle wrote: > Bash Version: 5.1 > Patch Level: 16 > Release Status: relase > Bash version: 5.1.16(1)-release (x86_64-alpine-linux-musl) > > Description: > Issue discussed at https://github.com/disney/meteor-base/pull/102 > Supposedly related with Bash5.1, 'hash npm'

Re: 'hash foo' may fail, and would require something like 'hash /usr/bin/foo'

i have observed many non on clean reproducable things over time On Tue, Feb 22, 2022, 22:00 Chet Ramey wrote: > On 2/22/22 3:38 PM, Benoit Lacelle wrote: > > bash-5.1# echo $PATH > > > > /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin > > > > bash-5.1# ls /usr/local/bin/npm > > > >

Re: 'hash foo' may fail, and would require something like 'hash /usr/bin/foo'

On 2/22/22 3:38 PM, Benoit Lacelle wrote: > bash-5.1# echo $PATH > > /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin > > bash-5.1# ls /usr/local/bin/npm > > */usr/local/bin/npm > > -> yes, there is such a file in a folder described by $PATH* I don't know what else to tell you. I c

Re: 'hash foo' may fail, and would require something like 'hash /usr/bin/foo'

bash-5.1# echo $PATH /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin bash-5.1# ls /usr/local/bin/npm */usr/local/bin/npm-> yes, there is such a file in a folder described by $PATH* Le mar. 22 févr. 2022 à 21:37, Chet Ramey a écrit : > On 2/22/22 3:35 PM, Benoit Lacelle wrote: >

Re: 'hash foo' may fail, and would require something like 'hash /usr/bin/foo'

On 2/22/22 3:35 PM, Benoit Lacelle wrote: > I understand we observe the same behavior, except on 'hash npm'. So now you look at $PATH and see whether there are files named `npm' in any directory in $PATH. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars lon

Re: 'hash foo' may fail, and would require something like 'hash /usr/bin/foo'

OK: bash-5.1# type -a npm bash: type: npm: not found bash-5.1# ls -l /usr/local/bin/npm lrwxrwxrwx1 root root38 Jan 3 19:28 */usr/local/bin/npm* -> *../lib/node_modules/npm/bin/npm-cli.js* bash-5.1# ls -l /usr/local/lib/node_modules/npm/bin/npm-cli.js -rwxr-xr-x1 roo

Re: 'hash foo' may fail, and would require something like 'hash /usr/bin/foo'

On 2/22/22 2:51 PM, Benoit Lacelle wrote: > Thanks Chet, but I'm lost. What's next step? > > I do not reproduce the issue either on my local macos. But I do in a > CircleCI VM: > > / # bash > > bash-5.1# type -a npm > bash: type: npm: not found If it's supposed to be in /usr/local/bin/npm, I g

Re: 'hash foo' may fail, and would require something like 'hash /usr/bin/foo'

On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 08:51:06PM +0100, Benoit Lacelle wrote: > / # bash > > bash-5.1# type -a npm > > bash: type: npm: not found Can you investigate further at this point? Show us the content of PATH, show us any and all npm files that are in every directory in PATH (including the permission

Re: 'hash foo' may fail, and would require something like 'hash /usr/bin/foo'

Thanks Chet, but I'm lost. What's next step? I do not reproduce the issue either on my local macos. But I do in a CircleCI VM: *circleci@a205c29cb489*:*~*$ docker run -it node:14.18.2-alpine sh Unable to find image 'node:14.18.2-alpine' locally 14.18.2-alpine: Pulling from library/node 59bf1c3

Re: 'hash foo' may fail, and would require something like 'hash /usr/bin/foo'

On 2/22/22 12:19 PM, Benoit Lacelle wrote: # docker run -it node:14.18.2-alpine sh Unable to find image 'node:14.18.2-alpine' locally 14.18.2-alpine: Pulling from library/node 59bf1c3509f3: Pull complete 331f5eb007b4: Pull complete bcd1922beba2: Pull complete 72573d587fdf: Pull complete Digest: sh

Re: 'hash foo' may fail, and would require something like 'hash /usr/bin/foo'

>From local MacOS (within Docker): bash-5.1# type -a npm npm is /usr/local/bin/npm >From remote CircleCI (within Docker): bash-5.1# type -a npm bash: type: npm: not found bash-5.1# npm --version <-- For the sake of confirming npm is resolved. 6.14.15 We observe 'sh' behave as expected in

Re: 'hash foo' may fail, and would require something like 'hash /usr/bin/foo'

Just in case, the reference github tickets holds additional details ( https://github.com/disney/meteor-base/pull/102#issuecomment-1047254127). I was unsure what best to provide in this report. By fail, I mean 'hash npm' unexpectedly returns 'bash: hash: npm: not found' in given CircleCI environmen

Re: 'hash foo' may fail, and would require something like 'hash /usr/bin/foo'

On 2/22/22 11:48 AM, Benoit Lacelle wrote: > Just in case, the reference github tickets holds additional details > (https://github.com/disney/meteor-base/pull/102#issuecomment-1047254127 > ). > I was unsure what best to provide

Re: 'hash foo' may fail, and would require something like 'hash /usr/bin/foo'

On 2/22/22 10:10 AM, Benoit Lacelle wrote: > Bash Version: 5.1 > Patch Level: 16 > Release Status: relase > Bash version: 5.1.16(1)-release (x86_64-alpine-linux-musl) > > Description: > Issue discussed at https://github.com/disney/meteor-base/pull/102 > Supposedly related with Bash5.1, 'hash npm'