On 4/2/24 4:33 AM, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
At 2024-04-01T09:27:27-0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 3/28/24 5:11 PM, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
Now that we're using a correct caret/circumflex/hat glyph on
modern typesetters (and terminals with a Unicode repertoire), drop the
thicket of partial-line
At 2024-04-01T09:27:27-0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 3/28/24 5:11 PM, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Now that we're using a correct caret/circumflex/hat glyph on
> > modern typesetters (and terminals with a Unicode repertoire), drop the
> > thicket of partial-line motion and type size-altering escap
On 3/28/24 5:11 PM, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
Now that we're using a correct caret/circumflex/hat glyph on
modern typesetters (and terminals with a Unicode repertoire), drop the
thicket of partial-line motion and type size-altering escape sequences,
certain to frighten and confuse any unfrozen c
Now that we're using a correct caret/circumflex/hat glyph on
modern typesetters (and terminals with a Unicode repertoire), drop the
thicket of partial-line motion and type size-altering escape sequences,
certain to frighten and confuse any unfrozen caveman page authors.
I expect this to slightly r