ion.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 9:39 PM Dennis Williamson <
dennistwilliam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 4:01 AM Michaelll Lee wrote:
>
>> . . .
>> While using non-printing characters without "\[...\]" proves to be fine in
>> ve
, 2022 at 9:47 PM Chet Ramey wrote:
>
> On 3/21/22 5:00 AM, Michaelll Lee wrote:
>
> > While using non-printing characters without "\[...\]" proves to be fine in
> > versions prior to 5.x.x (e.g., many suggestions from some online forums
> > have suggested &q
r to 5.x. According to my
limited tests, "Using standard ANSI escape code in prompt variable PS1" is
exactly the case. I think it would be better to document it in man
page/manual, or at least give a hint/warning for using non-printing
characters.
Nevertheless, Bash Long Live!
On Sun, Mar 20,
*Below are generated automatically by **'/usr/bin/bashbug' due to the
absence of 'rmail**’** command.*
---
*From:* Michael(lwl2...@gmail.com)
*To:* bug-bash@gnu.org
*Subject: *The Unexpected Behavior When Using ANSI
