Scraping through this - thanks for the lessons aka explanations.
On 18/03/2021 16:08, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 3/18/21 5:53 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
Yes, something to test. Thx. The ojdk scenario is: /usr/bin/printf >
>(tee -a stdout.log) 2> >(tee -a stderr.log).
So, yes, in thi
On 17/03/2021 23:12, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 3/17/21 3:29 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
I tried as many combinations of commands as I could - and it seems
that the regular behavior of dup2 on the opened fifo is enough to
maintain communication.
It's not, since FIFOs exist in the file system and
27;returns' - it ends via sh_exit() and the end of the routine.
Next time - I'll save all of my debug changes. Got a bit too rigorous
when I cleaned up.
On 17/03/2021 19:03, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 3/17/21 11:52 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
OK - this process on github has not gone exactly as
(pathname);
if (fd < 0)
{
/* Two separate strings for ease of translation. */
On 17/03/2021 16:17, Michael Felt wrote:
On 11/03/2021 18:11, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 3/11/21 11:28 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
Hi,
Issue: AdoptOpenJDK build process makes bash calls in a particular
way.
On 11/03/2021 18:11, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 3/11/21 11:28 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
Hi,
Issue: AdoptOpenJDK build process makes bash calls in a particular
way. An abbreviated (shorter pathnames) example is:
```
bash-5.0$ /usr/bin/printf "Building targets 'product-images
legacy-jre-
On 16/03/2021 16:21, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 3/16/21 11:07 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
On 16/03/2021 14:38, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 3/16/21 8:04 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
Decided to give bash-5.1 a try. I doubt it is major, but I get as
far as:
"../../../src/bash-5.1.0/lib/sh/tmpfile.c", l
On 16/03/2021 14:38, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 3/16/21 8:04 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
Decided to give bash-5.1 a try. I doubt it is major, but I get as far
as:
"../../../src/bash-5.1.0/lib/sh/tmpfile.c", line 289.11: 1506-068 (W)
Operation between types "char*" and "int&q
On 11/03/2021 22:27, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 3/11/21 3:55 PM, Michael Felt (aixtools) wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On 11 Mar 2021, at 18:15, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 3/11/21 11:28 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
Hi,
Issue: AdoptOpenJDK build process makes bash calls in a particular
way. An
Sent from my iPhone
> On 11 Mar 2021, at 18:15, Chet Ramey wrote:
>
> On 3/11/21 11:28 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Issue: AdoptOpenJDK build process makes bash calls in a particular way. An
>> abbreviated (shorter pathnames) example is:
>> ```
>&
Hi,
Issue: AdoptOpenJDK build process makes bash calls in a particular way.
An abbreviated (shorter pathnames) example is:
```
bash-5.0$ /usr/bin/printf "Building targets 'product-images
legacy-jre-image test-image' in configuration
'aix-ppc64-normal-server-release'\n" > >(/usr/bin/tee -a
/
test for AIX. If
not, we can consider this thread 'closed'.
Sincerely,
Michael
On 16/10/2020 15:16, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 10/16/20 6:31 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
>
>> OK. While - perhaps the root cause is differences in error-codes, or
>> something like that - and not t
10/15/20 3:03 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I don't actually use bash myself - so something that would be apparent
>>> to a bash user is invisible to me.
>>>
>>> As part of the packaging of bash-5.0.18 (i.e., 5.0 at patch level 18)
On 15/10/2020 16:21, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 10/15/20 3:03 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I don't actually use bash myself - so something that would be apparent
>> to a bash user is invisible to me.
>>
>> As part of the packaging of bash-5.0.1
On 15/10/2020 16:11, k...@plushkava.net wrote:
> On 15/10/2020 08:03, Michael Felt wrote:
>
>> $ exec > $ exit
>> root@x065:[/data/prj/gnu/bash/bash-5.0.18]
>>
>> ```
>>
>> As you can see by the return of the original PS1 - the sub-shell
>> (./b
Just repeated this on a system with bash that I did not package - and I
get the same results:
BASH_VERSINFO=([0]="4" [1]="4" [2]="0" [3]="1" [4]="release"
[5]="powerpc-ibm-aix6.1.0.0")
BASH_VERSION='4.4.0(1)-release'
...
```
_=/usr/bin/bash
aixtools@gcc119:[/home/aixtools]PS1='$ '
$ unset v
$ ex
Hi.
I don't actually use bash myself - so something that would be apparent
to a bash user is invisible to me.
As part of the packaging of bash-5.0.18 (i.e., 5.0 at patch level 18) I
ran the test suite.
a) is there a flag I can pass so that it ignores the UTF-8 tests? I do
not want to not build U
Sent from my iPhone
> On 17 Apr 2019, at 01:37, Paul Wise wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 14:57 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
>>
>> Why take so much effort to (imperfectly) figure out and display
>> things you already know?
>
> Correctness. If what the user knows
You mean think they know, bett
> On 11/1/2018 12:43 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
>>> I am mainly surprised by "process file table is full" - is there
>>> something specific I can do to look at this more closely?
>> No, it's expected. That script tests the behavior when the process&#x
> On 10/31/2018 9:31 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
>> On 10/31/18 3:13 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
>>
>> Running "make test", and I amy have forgotten something I did in the past.
>> a) running tests as root (initially)
>> b) ends with:
>> run-vredir
>&g
> On 10/31/2018 9:24 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
>> On 10/31/18 3:03 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I finally got around to patching and packaging bash-4.4.23 and had to
>> run a "make distclean" because I had copied the old version and without
On 10/31/2018 9:03 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I finally got around to patching and packaging bash-4.4.23 and had to
> run a "make distclean" because I had copied the old version and without
> the make distclean make kept looking for "bashversion"
Hi,
I finally got around to patching and packaging bash-4.4.23 and had to
run a "make distclean" because I had copied the old version and without
the make distclean make kept looking for "bashversion" in the old path
.../bash-4.4.19/bashversion
This is just FYI - I'll install yacc, which is what
I'll start all over again - using the following structure:
cd dist; wget distro..tar.gz
cd ../src; gzip -dc ../dist/distro.tar.gz | tar xf -
mkdir ../distro; cd ../distro
../src/distro/configure --arguments; make; make distclean
../src/distro/configure --arguments; make
As I have not been bu
I can down the distribution, e.g.
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-4.4.18.tar.gz, unpack it, goto base
directory and run configure.
Thought I had reported this earlier, but guess not!
If after a successful build, I run "make distclean" - "./configure &&
make" no longer works.
e.g.:
root@x0
h", line 47.22: 1506-334 (S) Identifier mbchar_t has
already been defined on line 175 of "../src/bash-4.4/include/shmbchar.h".
make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 1.
This is from a build done from the beta release from 24 hours ago.
Michael
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015
I do not mind installing yacc :)
How about the redefine of mbchar_t ?
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 10/22/15 3:47 PM, aixtools wrote:
>> On 2015-10-15 16:23, Chet Ramey wrote:
>>> The first beta release of bash-4.4 is now available with the URL
>>>
>>> ftp://ftp.cwru.ed
I am using patch 2.7.0 - and I get the warnings about dangerous files (what
is a dangerous file I ask myself) - but patching proceeds without any
problems.
Michael
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 9/30/14, 2:18 PM, Matthew Gessner wrote:
> > I apologize, but I somehow sen
27 matches
Mail list logo
