'read' builtin versus the full featured
autocompletion available in readline at the command line? Would this
be a difficult thing to implement?
-- Jeremy
er/numeric values less than
zero", "if ... [not] a number greater than [or equal to] zero" are used
repeatedly. In those cases "number" clearly doesn't exclude those less than
zero.
Jeremy Townshend
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: x86_64
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='x86_64'
-DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='x86_64-pc-linux-gnu'
-DCONF_VENDOR='pc' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale' -DPACKA
ot; side to write to the pipe.
>
> in theory, you should be able to delay the echo and it should still work...
>
> (sleep 1; echo echo '$1') | . /dev/stdin yes
>
> but on my mac, adding the sleep makes it fail reliably on the first
> iteration.
>
> on
".
ourscript --options" in a shell that does not support that, so it does not
help to know they could have done it better some other way.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:29 PM Martijn Dekker wrote:
> Op 10-01-19 om 22:52 schreef Jeremy:
> > We are trying to determine if the cur
er than a patch, to reliably test if
the current shell supports passing positional parameters to a sourced
script, without creating a temporary file.
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 8:11 PM Jeremy wrote:
> Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
>
> Machine:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:59 AM Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 1/10/19 2:52 PM, Jeremy wrote:
>
>> This command line should run forever:
>
>
>> i=0; while [ "_$(echo echo '$1' | . /dev/stdin yes)" = "_yes" ]; \
>
> do echo -n .; ((i++)
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:38 AM Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 1/10/19 2:36 PM, Jeremy wrote:
> > Agreed there is no likelihood of a patch to 3.2. However, this version of
> > bash still has a significant presence in the wild and this bug is
> breaking
> > an installation scrip
PM Jeremy wrote:
> (...)
> > 3.2.57(1)-release (x86_64-apple-darwin15)
> >
> >
> > This is on MacOS 10.11.6. If there is a better place for me to report
> this
> > bug, please let me know.
>
> Have you tried the latest version? Bash 5.0 was just released:
>
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: Mac
OS: Darwin
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: Xcode
uname output: Darwin Octo.local 15.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 15.6.0: Thu
Jun 21\
20:07:40 PDT 2018; root:xnu-3248.73.11~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
Machine Type: x
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: Mac
OS: Darwin
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: Xcode
uname output: Darwin Octo.local 15.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 15.6.0: Thu
Jun 21\
20:07:40 PDT 2018; root:xnu-3248.73.11~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
Machine Type: x
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: x86_64
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='x86_64'
-DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='x86_64-pc-linux-gnu'
-DCONF_VENDOR='pc' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale' -DPACKA
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: i686
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: afl-gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i686'
-DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='i686-pc-linux-gnu'
-DCONF_VENDOR='pc' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/local/share/local
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: i686
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: afl-gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i686'
-DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='i686-pc-linux-gnu'
-DCONF_VENDOR='pc' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/local/share/locale'
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: i686
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: afl-gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i686'
-DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='i686-pc-linux-gnu'
-DCONF_VENDOR='pc' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/local/share/locale' -
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 10/1/13 4:55 PM, Jeremy Lin wrote:
>
>> Thanks, I actually ended up with the same solution (for Bash 4.0 and above,
>> where 'compopt' is available, anyway). I just set '+o default' at the top of
>
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 9/27/13 3:57 AM, Jeremy Lin wrote:
>> I'm writing a completion where, in some cases, I'd like to use
>> COMPREPLY=() to indicate that no more arguments to a command are
>> expected, but in other cases, I'
estion). The closest I got was setting "-o default", and then using
COMPREPLY=("") to semi-deny completion, and COMPREPLY=() to get
filename completion.
Can anyone offer a better approach?
Thanks,
Jeremy
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: x86_64
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='x86_64'
-DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='x86_64-pc-linux-gnu'
-DCONF_VENDOR='pc' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale' -DPACKA
configure
script as an idea. Use umask 077 and create directory then user
can't place symlinks in it.
Jeremy C. Reed
technical support & remote administration
http://www.pugetsoundtechnology.com/
__
In den fruehen Abendstunden des 13. Februar 1945 gegen 21:41 Uhr
heulten die Sirenen der Lazarettstadt Dresden das erste mal auf. Die Bewohner
der Elbmetropole machten sich zu der Zeit noch keine Sorgen, da Dresden als
Stadt ohne Bewaffnung und ohne militaerischen Nutzen bekannt war und von ca.
21 matches
Mail list logo