On 04/24/2013 05:26 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 4/23/13 2:05 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>> As reported in http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?8025 , I would like to see the
>> SIGRTMAX-n signal names disappear.
>>
>> Signals should never ever be addressed with SIGRTMAX-n. S
On 04/24/2013 05:26 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 4/23/13 2:05 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>> As reported in http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?8025 , I would like to see the
>> SIGRTMAX-n signal names disappear.
>>
>> Signals should never ever be addressed with SIGRTMAX-n. S
?file_id=27910
>From d0d341e4e179d0ec3ce1f5a2bebe2aba7183a04e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harald Hoyer
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 07:41:59 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Obsolete SIGRTMAX-n signal names
Never ever address signals with SIGRTMAX-n. Signals should always be
addressed with SIGRTMIN+n.
h
