Fair enough.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 08:30:48AM -0700, David Maas wrote:
> > So if you really want my opinion, the shell should be aware that it's in
> a
> > function.
>
> Agreed, unless it's really ha
Incidentally, is it possible that somehow )) is simply interpreted the same
as } in this situation? It would also explain the perceived behavior.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:55 AM, konsolebox wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:45 PM, David Maas wrote:
> > Running the echo and other co
function with a scope) to work. Anyway if you guys don't want to fix it, I
doubt that many people would notice, but it is definitely a bug!
Thank you for discussing it,
David
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:55 AM, konsolebox wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:45 PM, David Maas wrote:
>
The behavior of bash in this instance
could cause a serious problem.
- David
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:38 PM, konsolebox > wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:52 AM, David Maas > wrote:
> > Hi! I found a bug in bash, I've checked versions 4.1 (centos 6.7), 4.2
> > (centos
Hi! I found a bug in bash, I've checked versions 4.1 (centos 6.7), 4.2
(centos 7.2), and 4.3.30 (from the ftp site). The bug is that if you do a
double parenthesis math thing with the wrong syntax, the script runs the
function during what I assume is syntax checking. Demonstration script is
attache
