>
> Well, then there's no way to tell how large the intersection of these
> two sets is, is there?
We'll know once I upgrade to the latest bash. Ideally, we should no longer
need our own private hacks to get bash cross compiling for our arch. If we
do, we'll know which patches still needs to go up
>
> I have fixed all the reported problems like this. Did you send in
> bug reports?
Ah, that's exciting to know! no, we fixed all of those inhouse :)
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Chet Ramey wrote:
> Anirban Sinha wrote:
> > Hmm, interesting. The patch that went in is slightly different:
> >
> > http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-4.0-patches/bash40-019
> >
> > Anyway, I have applied this patch to our copy of older bash:
.
and tested. The buggy pipe processing is now no longer present.
Ani
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Chet Ramey wrote:
> Anirban Sinha wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > This was brought up earlier this year. Unfortunatly, the patch suggested
> > does
> > not even compile. Is the
Hi All:
This was brought up earlier this year. Unfortunatly, the patch suggested does
not even compile. Is there any updates on this issue? Was there an updated
patch that is known to have worked? We are experiencing a
very similar issue on our box.
Thanks,
Ani
l...@xx wrote:
> Configurat
