Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@

2024-08-15 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
One more, please. (And please excuse this still copies bug-bash.) Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20240815184858.r5T_UQnM@steffen%sdaoden.eu>: |Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in | <20240814200534.Vh3Eu_Md@steffen%sdaoden.eu>: ||Chet Ramey wrote in || <1bba673e-5ab9-4263-9d88-124854793...@case.edu>: |||On

Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@

2024-08-15 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Hello. Unfortunately i have to add one thing to this thread.. Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20240814200534.Vh3Eu_Md@steffen%sdaoden.eu>: |Chet Ramey wrote in | <1bba673e-5ab9-4263-9d88-124854793...@case.edu>: ||On 8/13/24 8:45 PM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: ||> I include bug-bash even though i thi

Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@

2024-08-15 Thread Marc Chantreux
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 09:23:49AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > The most obvious would be to treat "$@$@" as if it were "$@" "$@", > generating exactly two words for each positional parameter. > > Thanks for this. My two cents: if I want "$@" "$@", i write it litterally. "$@$@" kinda