On 11/14/19 6:02 PM, Ángel wrote:
> I would say that the confusing part is that the behavior of the subshell
> is dependant on *where* it is being executed in the parent.
>
> In general terms, I would expect
> ( )
> to be roughly equivalent to
> bash -c ""
>
> i.e. being executed on its ow
On 2019-11-13 at 11:30 -0500, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 11/13/19 10:59 AM, Shaun Crampton wrote:
> > But the commands in the subshell execute inside a different shell
> > execution context so they shouldn't have
> > their own set -e context (Section 2.12)?
>
> Why? That section says the only thing th
