On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 09:42:01 +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> I expect that if you did look, you'd probably find that while
> technically the former, it isn't a reference to some wild pointer,
> but rather simply growing the stack until the OS says "no more"
> and returns a SIGSEGV instead af allocat
On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 08:52:25 +0200, Valentin Bajrami wrote:
> As earlier expained, you are calling foo function recursively. To mitigate
> this behaviour you simple set FUNCNEST= foo() { foo; }; foo where N
> denotes the number of nested functios to be called.
This is perfect and clear behavio
Hi Mike,
As earlier expained, you are calling foo function recursively. To mitigate
this behaviour you simple set FUNCNEST= foo() { foo; }; foo where N
denotes the number of nested functios to be called.
Op zo 7 okt. 2018 07:57 schreef Mike Gerwitz :
> Hey, Bob!
>
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 22:4
