Re: Bash printf builtin bug

2005-03-29 Thread Luke Kendall
On 29 Mar, Chet Ramey wrote: > That's what the `--' first argument is for: don't treat any remaining > arguments as possible options. In that sense, I suppose it *is* consistent with all the other commands. It's just a trap that the user must be aware of (as they must in general), when const

Security Center Advisory

2005-03-29 Thread PayPal
Security Center Advisory! We recently noticed one or more attempts to log in to your PayPal account from a foreign IP address and we have reasons to belive that your account was hijacked by a third party without your authorization. If you recently accessed your acco

Mail Delivery (failure bug-bash@gnu.org)

2005-03-29 Thread ohmasa
Norman Virus Control a supprimé le message original qui contenait le virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Bug-bash mailing list Bug-bash@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash

w Нужны_партнеры_в_регионах (стола)

2005-03-29 Thread Степан Евгеньевич a
  просто мы он азота  идет только <>___ Bug-bash mailing list Bug-bash@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash

Re: Bash printf builtin bug

2005-03-29 Thread Chet Ramey
> Machine Type: i386-redhat-linux-gnu > > Bash Version: 2.05b > Patch Level: 0 > Release Status: release > > Description: > Bash's builtin printf performs unwanted option argument interpretation > on the format string: That's what the `--' first argument is for: don't treat any rema