SouthTrust Security Alert

2005-03-27 Thread SouthTrust Security Team
Dear SouthTrust customer, Fraudulent activity has been registered on your account. Click here to prove your identity. Once you have confirmed your account records you will be able to continue using your SouthTrust Internet Banking account. Copyright © 2005 SouthTrust. All Rights Reserve

Re: using `set -e' in a subshell

2005-03-27 Thread Chet Ramey
Jim Meyering wrote: > Hi, > > Is the following behavior intended? > > I was surprised by the behavior of bash/zsh/ash/dash/pdksh, > yet Solaris 5.9's /bin/sh does what I expected: > > # Solaris 5.9's /bin/sh > $ echo a; (set -e; false; echo foo) && echo b > a > > # Yet bash/zsh/ash do t

Returned due to virus; was:Mail Delivery failure ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

2005-03-27 Thread bug-bash
Title: VIRUS INFECTION ALERT VIRUS INFECTION ALERT The WebShield® e1000 Appliance discovered a virus in this file. The file was not cleaned and has been removed. See your system administrator for further information. File name: noname.htm Virus name: Exploit-MIME.gen.c Copyright © 1993-2003, N

(no subject)

2005-03-27 Thread Natalia Beard
Do you ejaculte before or after few minutes of penetration? Then you MUST read this important new information! At last something can be done against this embarssing problem which leads to discomfort even in long established relationships. If you are man enough to read on... go here. Not interest

Re: using `set -e' in a subshell

2005-03-27 Thread Felipe Kellermann
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 7:43pm +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > Hi, > > Is the following behavior intended? Hi Jim, Yes. I've seen Chet replying to this subject sometimes here. > # Solaris 5.9's /bin/sh > $ echo a; (set -e; false;

Mail Delivery (failure bug-bash@gnu.org)

2005-03-27 Thread logir
Norman Virus Control a supprimé le message original qui contenait le virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Bug-bash mailing list Bug-bash@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash

using `set -e' in a subshell

2005-03-27 Thread Jim Meyering
Hi, Is the following behavior intended? I was surprised by the behavior of bash/zsh/ash/dash/pdksh, yet Solaris 5.9's /bin/sh does what I expected: # Solaris 5.9's /bin/sh $ echo a; (set -e; false; echo foo) && echo b a # Yet bash/zsh/ash do this: $ echo a; (set -e; false; echo foo) &

Re: Your document

2005-03-27 Thread eagerstudent
Norman Virus Control a supprimé le message original qui contenait le virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Bug-bash mailing list Bug-bash@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash

${#var} reports wrong size on invalid utf8 multibyte characters

2005-03-27 Thread hcz
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]: Machine: i386 OS: linux-gnu Compiler: gcc Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i386' -DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='i386-pc-linux-gnu' -DCONF_VENDOR='pc' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale' -DPACKAGE='ba