Re: Bootstrapping glibc vs. dependency on system headers

2013-01-25 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:34:09 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > For libc, I think always using $CC -E is fine. You don't need to bother > with the MSG_CHECKING and CACHE_VAL boilerplate. Ah, I thought the caching was required to have config.status' --recheck do the right thing. Which actually

Re: Bootstrapping glibc vs. dependency on system headers

2013-01-25 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:37:16 +0100, I wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:09:33 +0100, I wrote: > > Also known as: »I found another one«. > > (That's the last one I'm currently seeing.) Again depending on > usability, we either get: > > checking for [GCC] option to accept ISO C89... none n