[adding bug-autoconf, for an autoconf documentation issue]
On 06/26/2012 11:46 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> [adding bug-automake, to turn into a formal bug]
>
> On 06/26/2012 11:39 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>> And while looking into how M4 differs from coreutils, I noticed that
>> coreutils uses this v
On 06/26/2012 09:07 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> [adding bug-autoconf, for an autoconf documentation issue]
>
> On 06/26/2012 11:46 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> [adding bug-automake, to turn into a formal bug]
>>
>> On 06/26/2012 11:39 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>
>>> And while looking into how M4 differs from
[Adding bug-autoconf]
On 06/27/2012 12:40 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quick first impressions:
>
> Anders Kaseorg wrote:
>
>> Sidestep this problem by opening the backflow FIFO once for
>> read+write.
>
> Is that portable?
>
According to the Autoconf manual, no:
Some shells, like