Re: [PATCH] longlong: tune, particularly for common case of c99

On 02/16/2011 02:26 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: > I'm now looking to incorporate the crypto/md5 module into Emacs, > and trying to slim down its 'configure'. Here's one: if it's > C99 we don't have to test for 'long long' separately. Also, > in practice, if there's no 'unsigned long long', there's no

[PATCH] longlong: skip, rather than fail, on cross-compilation

* m4/longlong.m4 (AC_TYPE_LONG_LONG_INT): Avoid aborting configure when cross-compiling; regression from 2011-02-16. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake --- It turned out to be a simple fix (an empty 4th argument is fatal, so to skip cross-compilation, you have to provide an explicit no-op argument). Pus