Re: suggested rule for remaking config.h is wrong

2013-04-23 Thread Paul Eggert
Thanks, I pushed this: >From b0bc98f6a1a0bc6e92522d3c51284b89a446e083 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Eggert Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:42:41 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] doc: add missing semicolons to make rules Problem reported by Peter Eisentraut in

Re: suggested rule for remaking config.h is wrong

2013-04-23 Thread Eric Blake
On 04/23/2013 09:18 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > In the manual section "Automatic Remaking", the following rule is > suggested: > > config.h: stamp-h > stamp-h: config.h.in config.status > ./config.status > > This actually doesn't work so well. It should be > > conf

suggested rule for remaking config.h is wrong

2013-04-23 Thread Peter Eisentraut
In the manual section "Automatic Remaking", the following rule is suggested: config.h: stamp-h stamp-h: config.h.in config.status ./config.status This actually doesn't work so well. It should be config.h: stamp-h ; stamp-h: config.h.in config.status