On 2014-01-04 13:01:49 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2014-01-03 15:10:57 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> > So a simpler patch that fixes all of autoconf to use main(void)
> > instead of main() is fair game for immediate inclusion. Do you have
> > time to write such a patch, instead of waiting on me
On 2014-01-03 15:10:57 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> So a simpler patch that fixes all of autoconf to use main(void)
> instead of main() is fair game for immediate inclusion. Do you have
> time to write such a patch, instead of waiting on me?
I'll try to look at this today. At the same time, I think
On 01/03/2014 02:56 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/03/2014 02:51 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> A developer may want to test his software with
>> -Werror=old-style-definition (in particular because such definitions
>> could be a real bug in the software). But configure fails because
>> autoconf (vers
On 01/03/2014 02:51 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> A developer may want to test his software with
> -Werror=old-style-definition (in particular because such definitions
> could be a real bug in the software). But configure fails because
> autoconf (version 2.69) generates such a function definition.
