> On Jul 25, 2018, at 1:05 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> [snip]
>> Well, because I do a lot of cross-compilation and never get to actually run
>> most of the programs…
>>
>
> So... to add to this, the vast majority of autoconf
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 13, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>
>> On 04/13/2011 03:49 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>> It is sometimes useful to be able to detect the compiler version (as in the
>>> case of GCC 4.2 doing some fairly aggressiv
> On Apr 13, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>
> On 04/13/2011 03:49 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> It is sometimes useful to be able to detect the compiler version (as in the
>> case of GCC 4.2 doing some fairly aggressive optimization that breaks
>> fragile code).
>
> Thanks for the
Why not stick with what you have? It may be ugly, but
any Autoconfish replacement would be just as ugly, if
not uglier. And what you have works now.
On 4/13/11 3:59 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 03:49 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> It is sometimes useful to be able to detect the compiler version (as in the
>> case of GCC 4.2 doing some fairly aggressive optimization that breaks
>> fragile code).
> Thanks for the report.
>
>> How abo
On 04/13/2011 03:49 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> It is sometimes useful to be able to detect the compiler version (as in the
> case of GCC 4.2 doing some fairly aggressive optimization that breaks fragile
> code).
Thanks for the report.
>
> How about something like:
>
> AC_GCC_VERSION(VER,
