Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Yavor Doganov wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:10:49PM CEST:
> > Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > AC_INIT([Pkg], [1.0], [bug], [pkg], [website])
> > >
> > > Do you think that 'autoconf-2.63 -Wall -Werror' should have errored out
> > > for the website argument?
> >
> > Of
* Yavor Doganov wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:10:49PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Let's use a specific example:
> >
> > AC_INIT([Pkg], [1.0], [bug], [pkg], [website])
> >
> > Do you think that 'autoconf-2.63 -Wall -Werror' should have errored out
> > for the website argument?
>
> Of
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Let's use a specific example:
>
> AC_INIT([Pkg], [1.0], [bug], [pkg], [website])
>
> Do you think that 'autoconf-2.63 -Wall -Werror' should have errored out
> for the website argument?
Of course it should not and it would not error out. 2.63 is history,
so there's no
On 08/23/2010 03:45 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Yavor Doganov wrote on Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:42:54PM CEST:
Eric Blake wrote:
I have to wonder if there are cases where rejecting extra arguments
might not be advisable,
No, the behavior should remain the same (silently ignoring them); any
cha
* Yavor Doganov wrote on Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:42:54PM CEST:
> Eric Blake wrote:
> > I have to wonder if there are cases where rejecting extra arguments
> > might not be advisable,
>
> No, the behavior should remain the same (silently ignoring them); any
> change smells like a dangerous path to
