Re: The "I" of the manual is currently anonymous

2010-11-10 Thread Reuben Thomas
On 10 November 2010 23:29, Eric Blake wrote: > On 11/10/2010 03:28 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote: >> On 10 November 2010 22:08, Eric Blake wrote: >>> On 11/10/2010 03:02 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote: Attached, against current git. >>> >>> Thanks.  Can you convince your mailer to send patches as mime ty

Re: The "I" of the manual is currently anonymous

2010-11-10 Thread Eric Blake
On 11/10/2010 03:28 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote: > On 10 November 2010 22:08, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 11/10/2010 03:02 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote: >>> Attached, against current git. >> >> Thanks. Can you convince your mailer to send patches as mime type >> text/plain, so that they're easier to review in

Re: The "I" of the manual is currently anonymous

2010-11-10 Thread Reuben Thomas
On 10 November 2010 22:08, Eric Blake wrote: > On 11/10/2010 03:02 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote: >> Attached, against current git. > > Thanks.  Can you convince your mailer to send patches as mime type > text/plain, so that they're easier to review inline? My mailer is web Gmail, which doesn't seem to

Re: The "I" of the manual is currently anonymous

2010-11-10 Thread Eric Blake
On 11/10/2010 03:02 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote: > Attached, against current git. Thanks. Can you convince your mailer to send patches as mime type text/plain, so that they're easier to review inline? > The log of the history is superficially complex, but as far as I can > see, that's only because o

Re: The "I" of the manual is currently anonymous

2010-11-10 Thread Reuben Thomas
On 10 November 2010 17:34, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Reuben, > > * Reuben Thomas wrote on Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 03:24:01PM CET: >> The "I" author of the manual, I presume David MacKenzie, is not >> actually mentioned (any more?) in the manual. >> >> Perhaps the best solution would be to add hi

Re: The "I" of the manual is currently anonymous

2010-11-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Reuben, * Reuben Thomas wrote on Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 03:24:01PM CET: > The "I" author of the manual, I presume David MacKenzie, is not > actually mentioned (any more?) in the manual. > > Perhaps the best solution would be to add his name to the history > section, and then remove the use of