On 01/03/2013 04:54 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> Then again, it is autoconf that defines AC_PROG_MAKE_SET which in turn
>> provides @SET_MAKE@ for substitution in Makefiles;
>>
> Right, I had forgotten about that. I somehow just took it for granted
> that it was all Automake's doing ...
>
> So
On 01/04/2013 12:31 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 03:05 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
Yeah, probably AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE should enhance the configure help message
to report the "quirky" role of $MAKE (patches welcome).
>>>
>>> I'll think about an automake patch to make it precio
On 01/03/2013 03:05 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>> Yeah, probably AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE should enhance the configure help message
>>> to report the "quirky" role of $MAKE (patches welcome).
>>
>> I'll think about an automake patch to make it precious (at this point,
>> I'm thinking that the use o
On 2013-01-03 23:05 +0100, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 10:34 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
[...]
> > Hmm, that goes back to one of the questions we asked about Automake-NG -
> > is it possible to write a generic makefile that merely forwards all
> > requests to gmake, and where all of the real
