* Akim Demaille wrote on Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:20:27AM CEST:
> >OK. I've suggested splitting the autotest test suite before.
> >Let's look at that idea again sometime later (one file per test, and
> >source them for execution from the main test suite script), it's bound
> >to give both execution
OK. I've suggested splitting the autotest test suite before.
Let's look at that idea again sometime later (one file per test, and
source them for execution from the main test suite script), it's bound
to give both execution time improvements and portability improvements.
Using functions should
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 10:30:50AM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
> I would like to emphasize that having a single file was a goal: I
> meant the test suite to be easy to copy, to install, etc. [...]
but is there a market for it? AFAIK, people use ``make check'' to
test the just built progr
>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> OK. I've suggested splitting the autotest test suite before.
>> Let's look at that idea again sometime later (one file per test, and
>> source them for execution from the main test suite script), it's bound
>> to give both execution t
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 20:38:38 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Paul Eggert wrote on Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:27:17PM CEST:
> > "H.Merijn Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > First two bloks of tests passed (bison 2.2 did not pass), after which I
> > > killed the tests, a
#x27;m not
> talking about the "#! /bin/sh" line at the start of tests/testsuite;
> I'm talking about the shell that "make check" used to run it. E.g.,
> on my host it uses /bin/sh because "make check" eventually does this:
tcsh of course. What othe
* H.Merijn Brand wrote on Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:28:16PM CEST:
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 20:38:38 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Paul Eggert wrote on Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:27:17PM CEST:
> > > "H.Merijn Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > It's a long-known fact that t
* Paul Eggert wrote on Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:27:17PM CEST:
> "H.Merijn Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > First two bloks of tests passed (bison 2.2 did not pass), after which I
> > killed the tests, as AIX is s slow with the tests that I do not
> > care to wait for it to crash, be
of tests/testsuite;
I'm talking about the shell that "make check" used to run it. E.g.,
on my host it uses /bin/sh because "make check" eventually does this:
...
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/eggert/src/gnu/bison/tests'
/bin/sh ./testsuite
## -
