On 07/16/2012 10:53 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:14:01PM +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> Here are the errors that I'm getting:
>>
>> autoconf.texi:8018: Misplaced }
>
> I think that this is correct (and my guess is that the other are in fact
> consequences and similar o
You've convinced me, I will change my $ PATH, thank you, you do good
work.
Best regards
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:17:10 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/17/2012 11:07 AM, gilles.chara...@charabot-org.fr wrote:
and make install to install Autoconf2.62 and I have success in
this
Why 2.62 and not
> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 18:43:17 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 06:44:31PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:19:15 +0200
> > > From: Patrice Dumas
> > > Cc: stefano.lattar...@gmail.com, bug-autoconf@gnu.org, bug-texi...@gnu.org
> > >
> > > My
On 07/17/2012 11:07 AM, gilles.chara...@charabot-org.fr wrote:
>>> and make install to install Autoconf2.62 and I have success in this
>>
>> Why 2.62 and not 2.69?
>> I have tried many of them 2.69 and 2.68 and 2.62 and this is the same
> probleme,
That should be your hint that the problem is not
On 07/17/2012 10:43 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>
>>> In my opinion it is much better to have something consistent, and
>>> leaving the end of line out is also better in my opinion, otherwise it
>>> is not possible to have a macro expansion within a line.
>>
>> If this causes existing uses to break i
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 06:44:31PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:19:15 +0200
> > From: Patrice Dumas
> > Cc: stefano.lattar...@gmail.com, bug-autoconf@gnu.org, bug-texi...@gnu.org
> >
> > My wild guess is that this strange behaviour of makeinfo in C is a
> > result of
> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:19:15 +0200
> From: Patrice Dumas
> Cc: stefano.lattar...@gmail.com, bug-autoconf@gnu.org, bug-texi...@gnu.org
>
> My wild guess is that this strange behaviour of makeinfo in C is a
> result of the order of expansion that happens by chance, and is not
> intended.
No,
On 07/17/2012 08:05 AM, gilles.chara...@charabot-org.fr wrote:
> First, thanks to you for your free software. I use ./configure and make
> and make install to install Autoconf2.62 and I have success in this
Why 2.62 and not 2.69?
> task. But many gnu software using this version of autoconf say th
First, thanks to you for your free software. I use ./configure and make
and make install to install Autoconf2.62 and I have success in this
task. But many gnu software using this version of autoconf say that is
Autoconf 2.59 i am using ! By exemple automake now refuses to compile
with.
And wh
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:18:07PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> This is wrong, the newline at the end of the macro (after the @c)
> should be part of the macro expansion. AFAIR, this is how the C
> makeinfo worked, because the newline was collected as part of the
> macro body when the @macro..
10 matches
Mail list logo
