Stack Overflow Question

2021-06-18 Thread Adám Brudzewsky
Hi, can anyone answer this? Unrecognised symbols in GNU APL

Re: Stack Overflow Question

2021-06-18 Thread Chris Moller
There's a version GNU APL created by Jürgen Sauermann--based, I think, on GNU APL 1.8--on which your test cases work fine: x←1 2 3 4 5   u←6=x∘.+x   u 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0   ⍸u  1 5  2 4  3 3  4 2  5 1   {⍸6

Re: ar problem compiling 1474 for libapl

2021-06-18 Thread Dr . Jürgen Sauermann
Hi, the fact that config.log reports some libraries as missing should not matter, It merely means that configure has checked their presence and decided that they weren't there. The rest of the compilation then adjusts itself to that situation.

Re: Stack Overflow Question

2021-06-18 Thread Kacper Gutowski
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 01:50:51PM +0100, Adám Brudzewsky wrote: Hi, can anyone answer this? Unrecognised symbols in GNU APL Support for ⍸ was added in December 2020 (r1368). Released tarballs don't have it; you will have to compile the developmen

compiling ap/libapl

2021-06-18 Thread enztec
Hello Here is my situation with regards to my compiling apl/libapl i have a working 1182 apl/libapl which works perfectly - the 1182 libapl.so and libapl.a both compile the libapl_test.c code fine i tried to compile 1474 apl/libapl and the apl compiled with no problem but segfaylts when i di