Re: Build error for SVN 1365 on Mac OS X

Hi Jürgen, many thanks for that fast answer, on OpenBSD-current, I can confirm a successful built! br Otto Dr. Jürgen Sauermann writes: > Hi, > > thanks, hopefully fixed in SVN 1366. > > Best Regards, > Jürgen > > On 11/30/20 3:22 PM, Louis Chretien via Bugs and suggestions for GNU APL > wrot

Re: edif2 corner condition.

Hi Chris, I have done some inotify tests to see what happens using different editors. Editing a FUNCTION in apl-ws  will 1. start edif2 and create a file FUNCTION.apl - this file create will directly trigger inotify messages inotify_test/ *CREATE* FUNCTION.apl inotify_test/ OPEN FUNCTION.apl

Re: edif2 corner condition.

Sorry I haven't had a chance to look at that yet--when I'm not hacking code, I'm generally writing books and my publisher is pushing hard for final edit. On 12/2/20 10:27 AM, Hans-Peter Sorge wrote: Hi Chris, I have done some inotify tests to see what happens using different editors. Editi

Operator binding

Hi, in following up the recent email discussions with Jay Foad and Hans-Peter Sorge, I have changed the operator-to-operator binding in GNU APL. SVN 1367. Before the change an _expression_ with 2 adjacent operators, for example 2 /

Re: Operator binding

Great, this sounds like exactly the right thing to do if you're aiming for APL2 compatibility. Dyalog has to jump through some hoops when it parses 2//B, to treat the first / as a function but the second / as an operator. APL2's parsing rules are much simpler. Jay. On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 16:27, D

Re: Operator binding

On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 00:41, Jay Foad wrote: > Great, this sounds like exactly the right thing to do if you're aiming > for APL2 compatibility. > > Dyalog has to jump through some hoops when it parses 2//B, to treat > the first / as a function but the second / as an operator. APL2's > parsing rul

Re: Operator binding

On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 17:22, Elias Mårtenson wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 00:41, Jay Foad wrote: >> >> Great, this sounds like exactly the right thing to do if you're aiming >> for APL2 compatibility. >> >> Dyalog has to jump through some hoops when it parses 2//B, to treat >> the first / as

Re: Operator binding

Hi Elias, On 12/2/20 6:22 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote: On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 00:41, Jay Foad > wrote: Great, this sounds like exactly the right thing to do if you're aiming for APL2 compatibility. Dyalog has to jump through some hoops when it parses 2//B, t

Re: edif2 corner condition.

Hi, sorry for the previous long mail. Here is quite a short solution:-) In edif2.cc replace     // int    inotify_rc = inotify_add_watch(inotify_fd, dir, IN_CREATE | IN_MODIFY ); by     int    inotify_rc = inotify_add_watch(inotify_fd, dir, IN_CLOSE_WRITE); So far it solved the pro

Re: edif2 corner condition.

Well, sorry about my failure of diligence.  But your patch was just committed and pushed. Chris On 12/2/20 7:24 PM, Hans-Peter Sorge wrote: Hi, sorry for the previous long mail. Here is quite a short solution:-) In edif2.cc replace     // int    inotify_rc = inotify_add_watch(inotify_fd