Re: Empty arguments

On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 08:13:17PM -0400, Colin Verrilli wrote: This next one I'm not sure about. Theoretically, it should give the same result as above, but maybe the behavior is different for defined functions. ↑ (0↑(1 2)(3 4))f¨(0↑(1 2 3)(4 5 6)) 0 0 0 ⎕cr 'f' z←l f r z←l,r The AP

Re: Empty arguments

Hi Colin, thanks, see below... Best Regards, Jürgen On 5/3/20 2:13 AM, Colin Verrilli wrote: I was playing around with using empty arguments with functions to see what happens. This one seems to make se

Re: Empty arguments

Thanks Jurgen and Kacpur for the explanation. Makes sense. Also thanks to Jurgen for the fix. Colin On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 10:18 AM Dr. Jürgen Sauermann < mail@jürgen-sauermann.de> wrote: > Hi Colin, > > thanks, see below... > > Best Regards, > Jürgen > > On 5/3/20 2:13 AM, Colin Verrilli wrote:

Re: Slow down, latest updates

Hi Bill, I double-checked all differences between SVN 1273 and the latest SVN. The only primitive changed was dyadic ∼ (WITHOUT) which is not used in your function. Therefore I assume the change in performance was caused by differences

New build errors

Greetings, I am doing: CXXFLAGS="-Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wno-class-memaccess" ./configure make and getting: [...] Quad_RVAL.cc: In member function ‘Value_P Quad_RVAL::result_maxdepth(const Value&)’: Quad_RVAL.cc:371:22: error: logical not is only applied to the left hand side of comparison [-

[Bug c++/94905] Bogus warning -Werror=maybe-uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94905 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #3

SVN 1278 build failure

Hello -- The follow build error occurred with SVN 1278. OpenBSD/amd64, clang++ as compiler. struct random_data is a glibc extension and either needs to be defined in GNU APL for other platforms or not used. ~Brian c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..   -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -Wal

Re: New build errors

Hi Blake, thanks, fixed in SVN 1279. The -Wno-class-memaccess seems to be somewhat new and is only understood if the compiler also knows  -Wclass-memaccess. I am currently testing wit g++ 11 and will try to get rid of  -Wclass-memaccess

Re: New build errors

Builds now. Thanks! On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 10:29 AM Dr. Jürgen Sauermann < mail@jürgen-sauermann.de> wrote: > Hi Blake, > > thanks, fixed in SVN 1279. > The -Wno-class-memaccess seems to be somewhat new and is only > understood if the compiler also knows -Wclass-memaccess. > > I am currently te

Re: New build errors

Hi all, the *-Wclass-memaccess*warning should now be gone (*SVN 1280*). Jürgen On 5/3/20 5:36 PM, Blake McBride wrote: > Builds now.  Thanks! > > On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 10:29 AM Dr. Jürgen Sauermann > mailto:mail@j%C3%BCrgen-sauermann.de>> wrote: > > Hi Blake, > > thanks, fixed in SVN 1

[Bug c++/94905] Bogus warning -Werror=maybe-uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94905 --- Comment #6 from Arseny Solokha --- Thank you. (In reply to Dr. Jürgen Sauermann from comment #5) > Not sure how I can create a testcase file other than preprocessing or > minimizing it. Of course preprocessing is what you've been asked to d

Re: SVN 1278 build failure

Hi Brian, thanks, Hopefully fixed in SVN 1281. Best Rgeards, Jürgen On 5/3/20 5:16 PM, Brian Callahan wrote: Hello -- The follow build error occurred with SVN 1278. OpenBSD/amd64, clang++ as compiler

Re: SVN 1278 build failure

Hi Jürgen -- Now I get this. ~Brian Quad_RVAL.cc:483:6: error: member initializer 'N' does not name a non-static data member or base class N(8) ^~~~ Quad_RVAL.cc:488:12: error: out-of-line definition of 'do_eval_B' does not match any declaration in 'Quad_RVAL' Quad_RVAL::do_eval_B

Re: SVN 1278 build failure

Hi Brian, I see. Hopefully SVN 1282 works better. Best Regards, Jürgen On 5/3/20 7:10 PM, Brian Callahan wrote: Hi Jürgen -- Now I get this.

Re: SVN 1278 build failure

That works. Thanks! ~Brian On 2020-05-03 1:29 PM, Dr. Jürgen Sauermann wrote: Hi Brian, I see. Hopefully *SVN 1282*works better. Best Regards, Jürgen On 5/3/20 7:10 PM, Brian Callahan wrote: Hi Jürgen -- Now I get this. ~Brian Quad_RVAL.cc:483:6: error: member initializer 'N' does not n

Re: Slow down, latest updates

The change from 1273 to 1274 in Shape.hh after about line 65 appears to replace a constant with a structure (?I haven't really looked at what this all does). Backing this out from SVN 1282 speeds my test program up (and also gets rid of the compiler warning). On 5/3/20 10:49 AM, Dr. Jürgen Sa

[Bug c++/94905] Bogus warning -Werror=maybe-uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94905 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||24639 Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gn