Hi Xtian,
thanks, I have updated README-11-bogus-compiler-warnings.
SVN 1277.
Best Regards,
Jürgen
On 5/1/20 8:54 PM, Christian Robert
wrote:
Had to use this to compile on Fedora 32 with gcc 10.0.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94905
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94905
W E Brown changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||webrown.cpp at gmail dot com
--
You are rec
For the last updates, my little test program has slowed down by a factor
of more than 4, debian 32 and 64 bit. (Same updates as the compiler
problem appeared, I think.)
∇rr←sol nn
n←1↓⍳nn
r←,2
l:
→(nn<(↑n)*2)⍴x
r←r,↑n←(~∨⌿0=⊃r|¨⊂n)/n
→l
x:
r←r,1↓n
rr←+/r
∇
sol 20
Hi Bill,
I cannot reproduce this.
Did you run ./configure after updating from SVN?
Sometimes Makefiles slip
through and can cause performance differences that are then caused
by differering
./configure options. I normally use make
On 5/2/20 1:53 PM, Dr. Jürgen Sauermann wrote:
Hi Bill,
I cannot reproduce this.
Did you run *./configure*after updating from SVN? Sometimes Makefiles slip
through and can cause performance differences that are then caused by
differering
* ./configure* options. I normally use make developwhi
I was playing around with using empty arguments with functions to see what
happens.
This one seems to make sense
↑ (0↑(1 2)(3 4)),¨(0↑(1 2 3)(4 5 6))
0 0 0 0 0
This next one I'm not sure about. Theoretically, it should give the same
result as above, but maybe the behavior is different for d
