Re: Fwd: Re: Function editing and line editing have inconsistencies.

Hi, thank you for remembering me about the alternatives. It's remarkable how ingrained the old times editors are into my mind:-) btw - to remove the echo line from emacs M-x shell  set `comint-process-echoes` to `t` Best Regards Hans-Peter Am 12.03.20 um 22:26 schrieb Blake McBride: Or ... 

Re: Function editing and line editing have inconsistencies.

Hi Hans-Peter, thanks for reporting this. I have fixed 1. in SVN 1242. I could not reproduce 2. though, I get this: enter:   123 123   456 456 cursor up - display entr

Re: bug report

Hi Rowan, thanks for reporting this. The interpreter should have rejected the second { } because it is a dyadic operator with axis which is not valid in GNU APL. Fixed in SVN 1242 which now raises a DEFN ERROR. Best Regards,

Re: Fwd: Re: Function editing and line editing have inconsistencies.

On Fri, 13 Mar 2020, 19:31 Hans-Peter Sorge, wrote: > Hi, > > thank you for remembering me about the alternatives. > It's remarkable how ingrained the old times editors are into my mind:-) > > btw - to remove the echo line from emacs M-x shell set > `comint-process-echoes` to `t` > gnu-apl-mode

Re: Function editing and line editing have inconsistencies.

Hi again after some more testing it seems like the second error only occurs after entering the history a second time (like cursor ↑↓↑↓). Fixed in SVN 1243. Best Regards, Jürgen On 3/13/20 2:25 PM, Dr