Hi Elias,
thanks, fixed in SVN 1013.
/// Jürgen
On 10/09/2017 04:41 AM, Elias Mårtenson
wrote:
Thank you.
There are some errors when compiling on my Arch system:
Hi Elias,
thanks, fixed in SVN 1013.
/// Jürgen
On 10/09/2017 05:12 AM, Elias Mårtenson
wrote:
I found another bug. ↓ is used to indicate that
string indexes are requested, but the error message when
multiple o
Hi Elias,
thanks, fixed in SVN 1013.
/// Jürgen
On 10/09/2017 10:11 AM, Elias Mårtenson
wrote:
One more bug:
The call to pcre2_compile_32 should be changed from:
Hi Jay,
thanks, done.
Normally the doc subdir (e.g. in the savannah SVN repsitory)
contains the latest version of this file,
and I sometimes (read: usuaally) forget to also commit it to the
GNU web repository.
/// Jürgen
Hi Elias,
thanks, fixed in SVN 1013.
/// Jürgen
On 10/09/2017 11:46 AM, Elias Mårtenson
wrote:
One more issue. The last snippet in the info manual
for regexp (great work, and thanks for doing it, by the way)
Hi Elias,
I believe ↓ for 1↓ is too trivial to be useful.
Unoccupied variants of APL primitives (like monadic ↓ or monadic =)
are
a very scarce resource that we should not use for trivial things.
/// Jürgen
On 10/09/2017 11:06
Hi Peter,
the current syntax is A ⎕RE [X] B where A is the matching RE, B is
the subject
(sthe string being matched) and X is matching flags.
I never liked it when programs lumped these strings together into
a single string (or argument).
Since the subject has been brought up, how about using it as the analog of
first (monadic take), but instead unboxing the last element of an array in
ravel order?
I don’t think this can generally be done on an array X in a more concise way
than
first reverse ravel X
or
(shape X) pick X
which I
Sometimes we only want to know if it match or not.
I suggest a new flag ['m'] (as match) that will return ...
for a string: either 0 or 1 as a scalar for "not matching" or "matching"
for an array of strings: a vector of 0/1 for each string saying like above.
lets say:
z←⎕fio[49] '
I think you have a point. It would be very useful to be able to have ⎕RE
filter the results for you.
In experimenting with your specific case, I came across another use-case
that might warrant another flag: One that does not return the full match,
but only the parenthesised subexpressions (this us
10 matches
Mail list logo
