Re: [Bug-apl] Overflow in LCM

2017-04-20 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi Kacper, thanks, fixed in SVN 926. I believe that the last example is not an overflow but the proper result. At least tryapl.org says so. /// Jürgen On 04/20/2017 06:05 AM, Kacper Gutowski wrote: H

[Bug-apl] )HELP for defined functions

2017-04-20 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi, I have implemented Elias' earlier proposal for )HELP with defined functions (actually all kinds of user defined names). If there is a name, say NAME, in your workspace, then   ]HELP NAME should provide some informati

Re: [Bug-apl] Overflow in LCM

2017-04-20 Thread Kacper Gutowski
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 05:42:25PM +0200, Juergen Sauermann wrote: > thanks, fixed in SVN 926. > > I believe that the last example is not an overflow but the proper result. > At least tryapl.org says so. Thanks. I think the last one also should be positive. Tryapl says so too. -k

Re: [Bug-apl] Overflow in LCM

2017-04-20 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi Kacper, maybe, but the ISO standard says (function And/LCM on page 93) :   ¯29J53 ∧ ¯1J107 ¯853J¯329 So the question is: what are the rules for setting the sign of the result? No rules in ISO, no rules in APL2 either.

[Bug-apl] )HELP for defined functions

2017-04-20 Thread Fred Weigel
Juergen The help extraction works beautifully! I am making a change to toolkit to change first line of each comment to double-lamp (because that works perfectly). And this gives great help when working interactively! Again, many thanks! FredW