Re: [Bug-apl] r819 has severe performance issue

2016-12-13 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi, I see. This was supposed to fix some other problem, but apparently didn't work. I will look into this; in the meantime please fall back to r818 (*svn up -r818*). /// Jürgen On 12/13/2016 06:14 AM, David B. Lamkins wrote: Revision 819 causes *severe* performance issues for my APL Pack

[Bug-apl] 2 Defects in 81x

2016-12-13 Thread Fred Weigel
Two defects to report. I use GNU APL as libapl from another application (not lua). I also use parallel. Defect 1: In libapl.cc, function Unicode_to_UTF8(), the memcpy() second argument is &utf8.at(0) This is not correct with the current Simple_string.hh Easiest fix is to remove the "protected:"

Re: [Bug-apl] r819 has severe performance issue

2016-12-13 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi, I have reverted the change between SVN 818 and 819 and I hope everything is back to normal in SVN 820. /// Jürgen On 12/13/2016 10:10 AM, Juergen Sauermann wrote: Hi, I see. This was supposed to

Re: [Bug-apl] 2 Defects in 81x

2016-12-13 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi Fred, thanks, hopefully fixed in SVN 820. Please note that there are definitely some faults (lock-ups) remaining if parallel execution is enabled. These faults were sporadic and difficult to reproduce.  My benchmarks of parallel execution di

Re: [Bug-apl] r819 has severe performance issue

2016-12-13 Thread David Lamkins
Seems fine, here. Thank you. On Dec 13, 2016 10:44 AM, "Juergen Sauermann" wrote: > Hi, > > I have reverted the change between *SVN 818 *and *819* and I hope > everything is back > to normal in *SVN 820*. > > /// Jürgen > > > On 12/13/2016 10:10 AM, Juergen Sauermann wrote: > > Hi, > > I see. Th