wrote:
>
> With attachment..
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> Received: 01:09 PM PST, 02/24/2021
> From: edxmail-jo...@usa.net
> To: Russtopia ,
> Subject: Re: GNU APL versus 'tacit' style
>
>
> Welcome Russ,
>
> APL2, the language, is
Oh that is a very nicely-formatted version. Thank you so much!
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 13:12, wrote:
> With attachment..
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> *Received: *01:09 PM PST, 02/24/2021
> *From: *edxmail-jo...@usa.net
> *To: *Russtopia ,
> *Subject: *R
There's another language, J, created by the same guy who created APL,
that's very APL-like but does have trains, forks, hooks, and so on.
I've looked at it in detail and concluded that while APL has a bit of a
reputation as a write-only language, adding various tersifying
constructs only makes
With attachment..
-- Original Message --
Received: 01:09 PM PST, 02/24/2021
From: edxmail-jo...@usa.net
To: Russtopia ,
Subject: Re: GNU APL versus 'tacit' style
Welcome Russ,
APL2, the language, is standardized in ISO stan
Welcome Russ,
APL2, the language, is standardized in ISO standard 13751. The mischief you are experiencing is non-standard extensions.
I'm unsure what you mean by "tacit style"... indeed style is a very subjective topic and therefore WAY above my pay grade.
There are lot's of excell
Aha, of course just *after* posting to the list, I managed to find this
search page with idioms selectable by APL dialect -- tucked away
within Dyalog's 'miserver' demonstration site. It allows one to see idioms
for various dialects of APL (Finn, APL2, Dyalog).
Not quite 'how to do X with vs. with
