Hi David,
thanks,, fixed in SVN 779.
/// Jürgen
On 07/12/2016 06:55 PM, David B. Lamkins wrote:
clang++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -g -O2 -MT apl-SymbolTable.o -MD -MP -MF
.deps/apl-SymbolTable.Tpo -c -o apl-SymbolTable.o `test -f 'SymbolTable.cc' ||
echo './'`SymbolTable.cc
SymbolTable
Hi,
I see. I have changed the test in configure so that it checks whether the
compiler is g++ rather than whether it accepts -rdynamic. SVN 221.
That should also avoid the same warning in Solaris.
/// Jürgen
On 04/22/2014 07:01 PM, Peter Teeson wrote:
Hi Jürgen:
Gandalf:~ pteeson$ man gcc
No
Hi Peter,
fixed in SVN 220. The -rdynamic is described in 'man g++'.
/// Jürgen
On 04/19/2014 06:22 PM, Peter Teeson wrote:
/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I. -I../.. -I/usr/local/include -rdynamic -g -O2 -MT file_io.lo -MD
-MP -MF .deps/file_io.Tpo -c -
There is a workaround to avoid the warning though, and that is to do a
static_cast of the enum when you do the comparison. That was the
recommendation when I was googling about this issue.
Regards,
Elias
On 21 April 2014 18:24, Juergen Sauermann wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> thanks. Not sure if yo
Hi Vladimir,
thanks. Not sure if you can do anything about the text of the warning,
If so, then my proposal would be "comparison *may *always be true because
all declarators in enum XXX are smaller than int 10" or so.
/// Jürgen
On 04/21/2014 09:19 AM, Vladimir Ur wrote:
Juergen, hmm, ok. I a
Hi Vladimir,
I see. My point was just that the text of the warning, i.e. "comparison
is always true"
is wrong because it is, IMHO, not. And I hope that the optimizer in the
compiler does
not make the same assumption because that would lead to incorrect code.
/// Jürgen
On 04/20/2014 10:47 A
Juergen, I think whis warning is neither about compiler nor c standard.
It is about programmers' convention to use enum type to hold limited set
of values. Using enum for integer is not tricking the compiler, but
tricking other programmers who follow this convention (or even the self).
Most compile
Hi Peter,
I have changed it in SVN 215.
I still disagree with the warning because in a comparison of an
enumeration member
with an integer should perform integer promotion of the enum member to
int and then do
integer comparison and NOT convert the int to an enum member (which it
can't) and t
Hi Peter,
thanks, fixed in SVN 212.
/// Jürgen
On 04/18/2014 02:40 AM, Peter Teeson wrote:
Updated to revision 211.
../GNUAPL/apl-svn/src/UserPreferences.cc:378:1: Control may reach end of
non-void function
Peter
Updated to revision 211.
../GNUAPL/apl-svn/src/UserPreferences.cc:378:1: Control may reach end of
non-void function
Peter
10 matches
Mail list logo
