Hi Blake,
thanks, done, Will be in the next SVN commit.
/// Jürgen
On 06/03/2014 05:24 PM, Blake McBride wrote:
I like it, and I am in favor of it. It would just be great to add it
to the documentation as an enhancement over APL 2.
Thanks!
Blake
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:15 AM, Juergen
I like it, and I am in favor of it. It would just be great to add it to
the documentation as an enhancement over APL 2.
Thanks!
Blake
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:15 AM, Juergen Sauermann <
juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yes, the reason is this:
>
> Sometimes you want to have
Hi,
yes, the reason is this:
Sometimes you want to have (user-defined) wrapper functions around
primitives, for example
to get some statistics about their use (how often called, averge size of
arguments, etc).
It is pretty easy to convert a normal APL program to one using the
wrappers instead
As far as I understand, it's an extension that is unique to GNU APL.
Regards,
Elias
On 3 June 2014 10:37, Blake McBride wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> APL-1 did not allow functions to be defined with [ and ] in the header.
> I've seen it done in GNU APL as follows:
>
> ∇fun[⎕]∇
> ∇
> [0]
