Hi Peter,
I believe IBM's APL2 langage reference manual and the ISO standard
describe almost the
same thing in different ways. The ISO standard is a bit more formal
while the IBM docs are
more descriptive. Unfortunately the ISO standard has significant gaps.
most notably the
concept of bindi
Hi Peter,
I wouldn't really bother looking back - I have done a lot of them - ibm
370/tcc/stsc apl*plus/york apl/aplum/sax/aplx/apl2 (no dyalog!!) and this
gnu-apl is going to be cutting edge! Just post any code you have problems with
and people will look at - lots to learn but don't look back
